A variety of quantitative and qualitative methods and data sources were employed, including individual and focus group interviews, participatory observation, and survey questionnaires. The study encompassed 185 participants, consisting of 145 individuals from ethnic or racial minorities who were interviewed about their encounters with ethnic profiling, along with 26 police officers and 14 other experts. The data collection took place in the Helsinki metropolitan area and Turku between 2015 and 2017. The survey data encompassed 362 respondents, including young adults aged 15–29 from the Finnish majority population and four ethnic minority groups (Russian, Kurdish, Arabic, and Somali speakers).
The research revealed that individuals belonging to racialized minorities often face surveillance and ethnic profiling by various actors in urban settings. Stops and experiences of ethnic profiling significantly impact their daily lives, disrupting routines such as commuting and shopping, while also highlighting their status as "outsiders" and, in some cases, potential suspects based on their ethnic or racial backgrounds.
Responses to and interpretations of these stops varied, with some individuals expressing indifference or satisfaction with the treatment received during identity checks, while most described these encounters as unpleasant, annoying, or humiliating. The study found that negative interactions with the police can reduce the willingness of racialized minority individuals to seek police assistance or report crimes.
Intersectionality played a central role in understanding ethnic profiling, with young men from racialized minorities being the primary targets, especially in outdoor locations and public transport hubs. Women and older individuals were also stopped, often in shopping contexts and border control points, involving a range of security personnel.
The study identified four key police practices associated with the risk of ethnic profiling: control of foreign nationals (internal immigration control), suspicion and search related to crimes, public order policing, and traffic stops. The discretionary power granted to the police and the lack of clear criteria for reasonable suspicion in the Finnish Alien's Act contributed to the risk of ethnic profiling. Police practices sometimes began with racialized criteria, with language skills inquiries added later.
The study also highlighted the inadequacy of documenting the grounds for stops and ID-checks, particularly when the person stopped was a Finnish citizen or had a valid residence permit. Selective and ethnicity-based control acts by security authorities, especially security guards, were evident.
Overall, the research emphasized the need for information on the rights of those stopped and the complaint mechanisms related to ethnic profiling, as many respondents expressed uncertainty about their options for filing complaints. Despite numerous experiences of ethnic profiling, none of the interviewed individuals reported having filed a complaint. In addition to research findings, the project "The Stopped – Spaces, Meanings, and Practices of Ethnic Profiling" produced media and artistic content.
Keywords: ethnic profiling, racial profiling, police, private security sector, border control, customs, surveillance in shops, policing.
1. Racism in Finnish sports, brief history